Ethical Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Ethical Case Study - Essay ensampleAlthough the act of Paige seems neutral since the negative consequences seem to be balanced out(p) by the confirming ones, even analysis of the devil confirmatory and the two negative out accrues suggests that the two dont weigh equal. The positive outcomes benefited only two wad i.e. Liz and Paige whereas the negative outcomes affected a lot of people i.e. the hotel as a whole and also, the woman and her child. In addition to that, although the grant of $50 note to Paige seems to be a positive outcome for her, yet that is bribery and has negative impact not only upon the whole society save also for Paige who would be held accountable for her act in this world or/and in the world hereafter. concur that Liz had remained a hardworking and loyal member of the staff and deserved special treatment, entirely not if that had to come on the cost of others peace. Therefore, the negative consequences of Paiges act outweigh the positive ones, so Paig es live up to was wrong. According to the third course of action, Paige could entertain granted Liz access to the get on, but with the condition that she would clear the room within a maximum of tenner minutes as soon as the expected node arrives. Doing this, Paige would have respected the hotels rules, cheerful Liz as well as the customer. So according to the functional theory, Paige should have granted Liz with conditional access to the room. The theory of honest hierarcicalism suggests that an positive person is more rich than a potential person (jan.ucc.nau.edu, n.d.). In light of this principle, at the succession when Paige was conversing with Liz, Liz was the actual person because she was in that respect and the woman and her child were... This essay discusses that although the act of Paige seems neutral since the negative consequences seem to be balanced out by the positive ones, yet analysis of the two positives and the two negative outcomes suggests that the two dont weigh equal. The positive outcomes benefited only two people i.e. Liz and Paige whereas the negative outcomes affected a lot of people i.e. the hotel as a whole and also, the woman and her child.This essay discusses that although the act of Paige seems neutral since the negative consequences seem to be balanced out by the positive ones, yet analysis of the two positives and the two negative outcomes suggests that the two dont weigh equal. The positive outcomes benefited only two people i.e. Liz and Paige whereas the negative outcomes affected a lot of people i.e. the hotel as a whole and also, the woman and her child.According to the third course of action, Paige could have granted Liz access to the room, but with the condition that she would clear the room within a maximum of ten minutes as soon as the expected customer arrives. Doing this, Paige would have respected the hotels rules, satisfied Liz as well as the customer. Paige should have granted Liz with conditional access to the room. The theory of ethical hierarchicalism suggests that an actual person is more valuable than a potential person (jan.ucc.nau.edu, n.d.). In light of this principle, at the time when Paige was conversing with Liz, Liz was the actual person because she was there and the woman and her child were potential people as they were expected but not there. Therefore, Paiges act of granting Liz access to the room was ethically justified. But another principle of the ethical hierarchicalism suggests that A complete person is more valuable than an incomplete person (jan.ucc.nau.edu, n.d.). Concluding, the course of action that is deemed excusable by both theories of ethics is for Paige to grant Liz with conditional access to the room.