Theory of Justice

accord to the ratified dictionary (2010) the definition is sportingness, moral eighteens, a transcription of law in which every person receives their due from the system including each(prenominal) rights. arbiter is comprised of our fills, fair share, fair play, standing and trust. Cicero once SAA the Foundation of evaluator is good trust The main theory of justice Is that It is designed to be fair and an unprejudiced point of view that has been adopted Into our reasoning. Basically, the theory of justice guides us to mind and study the writings from philosophers like Rails, Locke, and Hobbes.Lockers view on justice was establish on the social contract theory. This popular opinion is that free people need to Greer on some ground rules in order to live together. in that respect are similarly specific theories dependent on the type of Justice. in that respect is the principle that tinges to a distributive style of Justice which basically determines Justice as to what is the fair share. Then there Is restorative Justice. Restorative Justice Is how we react to an activity that violates what monastic order deems fair play. The principles of Justice need to be fair to those involved and need to be consistent.This of course is barring any(prenominal) extenuating circumstances and if these circumstances exist there needs to be a vital residuum so o other source can be applied. Perfect wisdom has four parts, biz. , wisdom, the principle of doing things properly Justice, the principle of doing things equally in public and private fortitude, the principle of not flying danger, but meeting it and temperance, the principle of subduing desires and living moderately (Plato). Utilitarianism In order to understand how the principles of justice and how they differ from utilitarianism we need to know what utilitarianism is.Utilitarianism is the belief that the morally right choice is the only way to cause the about good. The utilitarianism belief may produ ce good but it also may trample the rights of the individuals. So the saying goes the good of the many outweigh the hardly a(prenominal) or the one. So I would have to say that the mall difference between justice and utilitarianism as we know It would be society has laws that pertain to everyone equally. Utilitarianism has two forms also. Act utilitarianism is defined as a person doing something that result benefit many but they do it without regards to their personal feelings or laws that society has made.Rule Utilitarianism is solely based on the idea hat provides the best outcome. According to Banks (2009) a utilitarian approach to public policy would require that government activity officials base their actions and programs on ten nigh accurate Ana telltale world-wide AT particular classmates and of the likely results of the alternatives and options available to them (Banks 2009). Justice Defined As stated above the definition of Justice would be a system of law in which ev ery person receives their due from the system including all rights.However if you asked someone in a iniquitous Justice agency they most likely would say that it is a system hat consists of the police, the courts and the correctional facilities. They would also say that Justice is what is received for committing a wrong. Today people front Justice as the item that is given out for breaking the law. certificate I would have to say the difference between Justice and security measures is Justice is the system and security is a tool. Security is defined as the freedom from danger or risk. I view security as part of the system. This is because security is becoming more a part of the criminal Justice system.